Category Archives: In the News

Tech news and opinions

Quick update on the Windows 7 Beta Download

Just to let all of you know that if you have been trying to get hold of the Windows 7 Beta, Microsoft has made a few changes for the better.

Firstly, it is now available properly again and anyone can get it.

Second, Microsoft have removed the download limit on the beta (thank you!!) and as long as you get in before the 24th January 09 you are fine. Microsoft will remove the beta altogether on the 24th.

However, once you have it, the installed beta will not expire until the 1st August 09. Just make sure you’ve got something to put back (like Vista or XP) before then and you are fine.

Enjoy the beta.

First Windows 7 Public Beta out tomorrow!

Just a quick message to say try and get in from work a little early tomorrow because the first public beta of Windows 7 will be released tomorrow!

Steve Ballmer confirmed at CES 2009 that it’s available for all tomorrow afternoon and the beta will not expire until August 31st. Get in for your download fast though because initially Microsoft is limiting downloads to 2,500,000.

iTunes is going DRM free!!

At last, senior vice president of Apple marketing. Phil Shiller finally announced at Macworld yesterday that iTunes is in the process of going DRM free!

Yesterday, 8 million tracks were converted to non-DRM tracks thanks to a deal with Sony BMG, Universal, and Warner music, and it has been said that all 10 million tracks on iTunes will be DRM free by the end of this quarter.

It has not yet been confirmed whether music you have already bought from iTunes will be stripped of its DRM, but we’ll soon find out.

If you use iTunes, which millions of us do, this is a big day. This may well cause the end of DRM forever, eventually.

Good times!

Executive of iPlayer suggests ISPs charge for high quality iPlayer

The executive in charge of the BBC iPlayer service has suggested that ISPs charge an extra flat rate charge of £10 per month to watch high quality streams of the iPlayer service. (Source)

In my opinion, I think that this isn’t particularly fair. If we are paying for bandwidth and speeds to watch this, why the hell are we being expected to pay for downloading (or streaming) content which we are allowed to in the terms of our ISP’s fair use policy.

Why should we pay even more? ISPs shouldnt charge us for bandwidth we already get in the terms of the contract. If you have 8MB per second broadband (or pay for this in the terms of your contract, even if you don’t physically get it) with say 40GB bandwidth usage per month (most “unlimited” ISPs allow that amount) then you shouldnt have to pay for any more, I think. A couple of high quality streams from iPlayer in a month won’t even get you vaguely close to 40GB. Perhaps, if you are on a more limited contract with perhaps 5GB usage, ISPs may well have to charge you, but most people have more usage than that.

iPlayer claim that currently the streams they run at the moment are 700kbps, but in 3 months time they may be up to 1.5mbps. Why? Do we really need that? iPlayer streams are perfectly good now, even on a large TV. It seems utterly pointless.

Besides, if you want high quality, just download the video. They tend to be very good quality at still a relatively low file size.

It just doesn’t make sense. ISPs are saying that the internet is slowing down because people use iPlayer too much and that hogs all the bandwidth. But it shouldnt. If we pay for a deal that theoretically should cope with the bandwidth that iPlayer uses, why are they complaining? Who’s to blame?

We already pay TV liscenses (well you do if you have a TV – or should be – but you don’t have to if you don’t have a TV in the house and don’t watch live TV), broadband costs, and equipement costs. The last thing people want is for ISPs to be charging us rediculous amounts of money for bandwidth usage we should already have.

It doesn’t make any sense at all to me. What are your thoughts?

Radio could go digital in 2017?

According to http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7792083.stm (BBC News), there are reports that radio could be 100% digital in 2017. That means that in 9 years time, there may be no analogue signal at all.

We’re already in the process of the digital switchover for televison, whic is supposed to be finished by 2012.

In my opinion, I think it’s quite good that we’re switching to digital radio. It does have its problems – I mean signal isn’t exactly brilliant; especially in rural areas – but otherwise I love my DAB radio. There are tonnes of stations (half of them I wouldn’t even think about listening to), some of which are good, and where signal is good it is very crisp and clear. I am hoping to get a pocket DAB radio sometime since they seem to be good for long journeys, and it will be nice when phone companies can develop the technology to have built-in DAB radios. Most phones I see usually only have FM radios and on some 3G radios there is online radio.

What do you think? Do you still use DM radio or are you a DAB addict? Do you think a switchover is a good idea?